<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Surrogacy in India &#187; union of india</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/tag/union-of-india/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com</link>
	<description>Web-blog of Indian Surrogacy Law Centre</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 04:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Updates on Jan Balaz Case</title>
		<link>http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2009/12/updates-jan-balaz-case/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2009/12/updates-jan-balaz-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 06:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hari Ramasubramanian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[india surrogacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jan balaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law of surrogacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court of india]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surrogacy law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union of india]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/?p=103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am making this post partly from the Supreme Court of India for India vs. Jan Balaz. The case was posted before the Bench consisting of G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly. The Solicitor General of India, Mr. Gopal Subramanian unfolded India’s stand that India is unable to grant Indian Citizenship to a children merely for the purpose of taking them to their homeland. Moreover, he wanted Mr. Jan Balaz to unconditionally submit to the Apex Court’s Jurisdiction even if he gets outside India. Senior Counsel Mr. Rao said he shall undertake to fulfill all conditions as imposed by the Union of India in order to take his children back to his nation. The case is next posted for hearing on the 4th January 2010. There are lots of unanswered hitches which are to be decided by the Supreme Court of India. Meanwhile, Indian Surrogacy Law Centre is still deciding it’s modalities of contributing for this case. I shall write on this subject more when there is an improvement.


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2010/01/updates-jan-balaz-case-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Updates on Jan Balaz Case'>Updates on Jan Balaz Case</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2010/02/jan-balaz-supreme-court-birth-certificate/' rel='bookmark' title='Jan Balaz case'>Jan Balaz case</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2010/05/cara-agrees-to-provide-no-objection-certificate-in-the-jan-balaz-case-german-coupl/' rel='bookmark' title='CARA agrees to provide No Objection Certificate in the Jan Balaz case'>CARA agrees to provide No Objection Certificate in the Jan Balaz case</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;">I am making this post partly from the Supreme Court of India. I flew down from Chennai to Delhi for attending the case of Union of India vs. Jan Balaz. The case was posted before the Bench consisting of G S Singhvi and A K Ganguly. The Solicitor General of India, Mr. Gopal Subramanian unfolded India’s stand that India is unable to grant Indian Citizenship to a children merely for the purpose of taking them to their homeland. Moreover, he wanted Mr. Jan Balaz to unconditionally submit himself to the Jurisdiction of the Apex Court even if he moves outside India. Senior Counsel Mr. Rao said he shall undertake to fulfill all conditions as imposed by the Union of India in order to take his children back to his nation. The case is next posted for hearing on the  4<sup>th</sup> January 2010. There are lots of unanswered hitches which are to be decided by the Supreme Court of India. Meanwhile, Indian Surrogacy Law Centre is still deciding it’s modalities of contributing for this case. I shall write on this subject more when there is an improvement.</p>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2010/01/updates-jan-balaz-case-2/' rel='bookmark' title='Updates on Jan Balaz Case'>Updates on Jan Balaz Case</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2010/02/jan-balaz-supreme-court-birth-certificate/' rel='bookmark' title='Jan Balaz case'>Jan Balaz case</a></li>
<li><a href='http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2010/05/cara-agrees-to-provide-no-objection-certificate-in-the-jan-balaz-case-german-coupl/' rel='bookmark' title='CARA agrees to provide No Objection Certificate in the Jan Balaz case'>CARA agrees to provide No Objection Certificate in the Jan Balaz case</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.indiansurrogacylaw.com/2009/12/updates-jan-balaz-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

